Medicare Commercial Repayment Center
The Commercial Repayment Center (CRC) will now pursue recovery on claims where the insurer is the debtor: typically No-Fault and Workers’ Compensation claims. This change can leave P&C Insurers scrambling to keep up, but Flagship Services Group is here to help you overcome pending challenges.
Immediate Effects of Reporting via Section 111
Insurers can expect the CRC to review claims reported via Section 111 reporting to determine if conditional payments were made by Medicare that need to be recovered. However, unlike their counterparts at the BCRC, they will not wait for the settlement to be finalized before pursuing reimbursement. As soon as an insurer reports the assumption of ORM, the CRC will investigate whether Medicare has already made payments they believe are related to the claim and send Conditional Payment Notices (CPN). The CRC begins recovery work immediately without waiting for termination of Ongoing Responsibility for Medicals (ORM) or settlement. Accurate Section 111 reporting will be crucial.
Increased Conditional Payment Notices
Based on its audits of reported claims, the CRC will issue a Conditional Payment Notice on every workers’ comp or no-fault claim reported under Section 111 when they have determined Medicare has paid bills related to that claim. The CRC’s focus includes:
- Workers’ Compensation
- Currently, it does not include TPOCs
The Conditional Payment Notice outlines all charges Medicare has paid and expects to be reimbursed. In other words, Medicare will send a bill for every single claim where they should be the secondary payer. You can never assume that all the charges on a CPN are related to the injuries sustained.
Automatic Demand Letters
If a Responsible Reporting Entity (RRE) feels the charges are unrelated, you have only 30 days to dispute the charges. If no dispute is submitted in the 30 day timeframe, the CPN automatically converts to a Final Demand letter (FDL) and interest will start to accrue. This requires RREs to dispute the CPN within a month. If you do not respond within the 30 days, you will possess a FDL.
How Does Flagship Help?
- Flagship has been reviewing and disputing CPNs for several years. We have a proven process to work with Medicare.
- Flagship’s proprietary LumenX claims system ensures that every Medicare-related claim is properly identified, reported, and reviewed for recovery.
- Compliance experts review every Medicare claim to make sure you’re reporting and reimbursing Medicare for everything they are rightfully owed, but not a penny more.
- Our free risk analysis can quickly identify gaps in your compliance process and prevent unnecessary fees.
- Louisiana Appellate Court Rules CMS Approval of MSA Was a Suspensive Condition that Suspended Obligation to Fund the MSA Until CMS Approval (5/21/2018) - Rafael Gonzalez, Esq. President, Flagship Services Group On May 2, 2018, the Third Circuit Court of Appeal of Louisiana published its opinion on Mary Ortega v. Cantu Services, Inc., concluding that the settlement of the workers compensation claim at hand was conditioned on CMS approval of a Medicare Set-Aside. Because the settlement agreement did not […]
- 6th Circuit Denies Beneficiary MSP Double Damages for Not Alleging Personal Financial Loss and Therefore Not Establishing Standing (5/15/2018) - On April 16, 2018, the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals published its opinion on Gucwa and Marusza v. Lawley, Ager, Baker, Rubin and Accident Fund Insurance Company, finding that because Gucwa and Marusza did not allege personal financial loss in the original complaint or the two amended complaints, they have not established standing […]
- A Tale of Two Courts: Can MAPs Recoup MSP Double Damages from Medical Providers That Have Received Payment from Primary Payer? (4/23/2018) - Rafael Gonzalez, Esq. President, Flagship Services Group What a difference a couple of miles and a couple of days make. On March 2, 2018, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, (Orlando), published its opinion on MSPA Claims 1, LLC v. Halifax Health, Inc., in which the court found that a […]