Rafael Gonzalez No Comments

On Behalf of Our Flagship Family, Wishing You a Wonderful Holiday Season

On behalf of everyone associated with Flagship, I wanted to take this opportunity to thank you, all of our friends, colleagues, and especially our customers, for your trust and confidence in Flagship. It truly means the world to us. To know that after all these years, despite all of the statutory amendments, the compliance challenges, and the regulatory changes, you still count on us for updates, information, training, guidance, and advice on all of your Medicare and Medicaid risk management issues is so very significant for each of us at Flagship.

Read more

Rafael Gonzalez No Comments

New Mexico Federal District Court Finds CMS’ Failure to Clarify if MSAs are Required in Liability Settlements Proving Burdensome in Settlement Process

On November 28, 2017, the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico published its opinion in Silva v. Burwell, concluding that the uncertainty created by CMS’s repeated failure to clarify its position on requiring MSAs in personal injury settlements generally and in specific cases is proving burdensome to the settlement process. The Court further finds this case is not ripe for review because no federal law mandates CMS to decide whether Plaintiff is required to create a MSA. The Court reiterates that just because CMS has not responded to Plaintiff’s requests to clarify whether an MSA is required in personal injury claims is not reason enough for this Court to step in and determine the propriety of its actions. There may be a day when CMS requires the creation of MSA’s in personal injury cases, but that day has not arrived.

Read more

Rafael Gonzalez No Comments

Illinois Federal District Court Finds Surviving Spouse and Adult Children Must Reimburse Medicare $105,000 from Med Mal $250,000 Settlement

illinois Federal Disctrict Court Find Surviving Spouse and Adult Children Must Reimburse Medicare

On November 26, 2017, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois published its opinion on Paraskevas v. Price, concluding that Medicare did not abuse its discretion in finding that the state court settlement order was not on the merits and was therefore not binding on CMS when seeking reimbursement of conditional payments. The Court finds the settlement compensated Plaintiff not only for the wrongful death action, but also the estate’s survivor claims in connection with the medical malpractice claim. Medicare’s decision is affirmed, and the Secretary’s final decision that Plaintiff owes $105,000 plus interest in reimbursement of conditional payments made stands.

Read more